The Beatles Present Let It Be, the Enhanced Album

Will this (movie) simply be a remake of  Let It Be, using the original title of the album, with everything McCartney objected to removed? – Random Internet commenter

“John walked into the room one day and said, ‘I’m leaving the Beatles.’ And he said, ‘It’s quite thrilling. It’s rather like a divorce.’ And then we were left to pick up the pieces.” – Paul McCartney*

On the off chance that you’ve been living in a cave, Kiwi director Peter Jackson has been taking the mongo-depressing 1970 Let it Be film and reshaping it into a six-hour series. They have been promoting this thing pretty relentlessly for maybe a year now – Twitter, Facebook, trailers – you know, the whole publicity/advertising/promotion scheme.

Why? Two words – cash grab. Let’s face it – Let It Be is a good album but it is literally nobody’s favorite album. Not the public’s, not critics, not even – as far as I can ascertain – the Beatles. For greatness, one goes to Rubber Soul, Revolver, Sgt Pepper, Abbey Road. (Coin toss on the White Album).

As a confirmed Beatlemaniac, I will be front and center for the viewing of this film. In fact, it’s literally the only reason I still have Disney+. (I got it initially to watch Hamilton.) Early reports say that it shows a “happier” Fab Four.

Yeah, somehow I doubt it. I followed this saga in Rolling Stone back in the day – the long delay of what was originally called Get Back, the Apple Records fiasco, the back-and-forth lawsuits, the insulting songs. The only person who still wanted – and seems to still want – the band together was Macca. They were all pretty well sick of the whole thing, each other and – especially – McCartney himself. (“I’ll play whatever you want me to play. Or I won’t play at all if you don’t want me to play. Whatever it is that will please you, I’ll do it.” – George to Paul in Let It Be.)

The lads got themselves stuck in some fucking godforsaken film studio as opposed to their beloved Abbey Road. So this film is as much a record of their dissolution as it is anything else and no amount of reassembling the footage is going to change that fact.

The reason I’m writing today is that the Beatles organization (Paul, Ringo, Yoko, Olivia Harrison) quietly dropped this album on Spotify the other day. It consists of the original album and then a bunch of outtakes, alternate takes, etc.

As mentioned earlier, Let It Be is a good album but not a great one. By 1970, the Beatles were pretty much a spent force and there were plenty of other bands that were pushing the boundaries of where music could go. Maybe the biggest sin of this otherwise entertaining album is that it doesn’t break any new ground.

The good news is that while it was the last released album, Abbey Road is actually their last album. That album – minus the crud known as Octopus’ Garden and Maxwell’s Douchebag Hammer – is a much more fitting final walk-off for the Fab Four.

So how is it? Well, there is a fair amount of in-studio patter and so songs are often named after what one of the guys says. So John says “Morning, everybody. Morning camera.” Then they launch into Take 4 of “Two of Us.”

There’s also one called “I Don’t Know Why I’m Moaning” which Paul says but is really just a minute or so of the guys talking. It’s actually kind of revelatory because it shows how John is trying to explain to the band how Paul’s song is becoming something he doesn’t want it to be.

There’s a “Let It Be” which Paul morphs into a slow “Please Please Me” on piano, and then a couple of alternate takes of other tunes. They play the rooftop version of “Don’t Let Me Down” (one of my favorites) and it’s interesting to hear John and Paul harmonize on this. And it’s really interesting to hear them work on “Gimme Some Truth” which wound up on Imagine.

There’s a couple of tunes that wind up on Abbey Road (Polythene Pam, Bathroom Window, Something) and things that are labeled “Glyn Johns Mix.”

Anyway, you get the idea. This album strikes me as being much like the Beatles Anthology that was released back in 1995 – some good stuff, some demo stuff, etc. But at the end of the day, largely forgettable. (I guarantee you there are “completists” who will buy this CD set because it fills out their collection. And they will listen to it once or twice then never again.)

For me though, I’ll admit it was fun to listen to the outtakes and even more fun to drive around (my favorite way to listen to music) and listen to the original again. Even in their lesser songs, there was a magic that happened whenever the Beatles played together and it’s always enjoyable to hear that. Especially as an album and not as a bunch of disjointed tunes on satellite radio.

For the record, the Get Back documentary airs on November 25, 26, and 27. Hurry the fuck up already.

*Macca’s been on a real run of comments lately. He recently referred to the Stones as a “blues cover band.” Still fighting that fight, Paul? For the record, the first song Jagger/Richards wrote was “As Tears Go By.” I could name an absolute shitload of non-blues tunes by the Stones. Jagger had previously said, “One band is unbelievably luckily still playing in stadiums, and then the other band doesn’t exist.” And at a recent show, snarkily invited McCartney up to do a blues cover.

Hey. Let it be or let it bleed guys. What would Keef say if he were still alive????

Movie trailer

 

10 thoughts on “The Beatles Present Let It Be, the Enhanced Album

    1. You’d have to be lot more diehard a fan than I am to think any of those outtakes are worth a damn. Seems to me like Beatles fans will get not much and the people who splurge for the box set will knowingly get fleeced.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Maybe some new fans will be brought on board. Seems like so many acts do this and have for years. Obviously profitable. Ive indulged in a few box sets myself.
        Back when I remember grabbing Townsend’s ‘Scoop’ albums. I really liked them. Bruce seems to be going heavy with all this rerelease stuff. I dont have any money left.

        Like

        1. I bought Clapton’s “Crossroads” but that was a nice overview of his career not, say, Yardbirds outtakes. I also bought the Allmans ‘Dreams’ and Duane’s anthology. And the Police box set. But the only money I now spend on music – outside of concerts – is my yearly Spotify and Sirus subscriptions.

          Liked by 1 person

  1. I’ve seen the trailer a few times and will definitely be watching this one – Iove these making-of dos at the best of times especially one when that captures the band at such a tense time (seeing Yoko just sitting there on next to John at so many band sessions feels weird just watching the trailer).
    Curious how Spector’s involvement will be handled.
    As for Let It Be as an album I think the ‘Naked’ version they did a while back was pretty decent

    Like

    1. Jesus, I’m overdue to get to your site. It’s all I can do to keep up with Christian.

      I don’t recall your having any great feeling one way or the other for your countrymen. So is this mostly interest in ‘making of’ or do you actually have some fondness for those Northern wankers?

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Those northern monkeys made plenty of great tunes and I love a lot of their music – I think I put up a list of my favourites way back when I started this thing.
        I’m always fascinated by the leaps they made as both musicians and songwriters as well as their impact on culture and just how much they shifted the game… I mean you can’t pick up many musical bios these days without reference to how The Beatles – and their appearance on the Ed Sullivan show – were the spark.

        Like

        1. Yes, seemingly every 12-year-old boy in (at least) America took up an instrument on seeing them. Cataclysmic. I’ve often said that if you took all the British albums out of my collection I’d have nothing left but three Pat Boone records and one Cher album.

          Liked by 1 person

  2. It’s not even the best album titled Let It Be. I’m a fan but the back to basics approach didn’t suit them. I don’t think I could sit through the documentary.

    Like

    1. Heh! We saw The Replacements open for Elvis Costello in 1991 (I had to look the date up.) Good band, good show. Then I saw Elvis again almost 30 years later.

      I had a hard time trying to watch the movie not too long ago. But I confess I am intrigued by this longer version

      Liked by 1 person

What would you say?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s